The Fighting Ninth: Rick Boucher versus Morgan Griffith

Tonight, the eve of the 2010 election, in Virginia's Ninth Congressional District, The Fighting Ninth, we have two pro-abortion candidates:  Rick Boucher and Morgan Griffith.

Rick Boucher, the incumbent, is a liberal Democrat committed to keeping child-killing the most protected institution of the state since slavery.

Delegate Morgan Griffith, the challenger, is a Republican who stands the best chance in 28 years of unseating Congressman Boucher. . . if you believe the polls.

Morgan Griffith claims to be 100% pro-life.

Morgan Griffith is NOT pro-life.

Morgan Griffith does not believe that life begins at conception.

According to Blake Roark, the Field Director out of the Abingdon office, Morgan Griffith believes that life begins at "implantation".

This statement is consistent with Morgan Griffith's vote against Bob Marshall's 2007 HB 2797 LIFE AT CONCEPTION ACT.    Actual vote results:  http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?071+vot+HV0657+HB2797

Morgan Griffith's position leaves room for the following:

- RU-486
- "Research" (experimentation) on live human embryos
- Fertility clinics that throw live human embryos in the trash

Morgan Griffith has kept information about his actual position quiet and deliberately confusing, even from his own staff members who think he is 100% pro-life.

Principled voters must not vote for Morgan Griffith unless he commits in writing that he is 100% pro-life from the time of conception.  This is a very simple, principled, uncompromising stand.

Unfortunately many people will approach their vote pragmatically and vote for Morgan Griffith.  They will see him as the lesser of two evils.

These people will disregard what I have to say.  I direct my remarks to the principled voters of Virginia's Ninth Congressional District.

1.  It is God who decides the outcome of all elections.
2.  To vote for the "lesser of two evils" is to fear man rather than God.
3.  We have rulers who are pragmatists because we have been a nation and a church of pragmatists.  "We are so afraid of losing to the 'greater evil' that we consistently give away the farm to the 'lesser evil'."
4.  It is the duty of Christians to vote righteously.  If there is no righteous candidate in the race, leave the ballot blank or vote for yourself.

A friend of mine comments, "Is the urgency to defeat Rick Boucher really strong enough to justify replacing him with a slightly less liberal version of himself?

"Morgan Griffith is wrapped up in a shiny "Pro-Life" wrapper, but he has demonstrated that his idea of pro-life isn't much different than Roe v. Wade, which recognizes unborn life as beginning at "viability". Viability vs implantation, the only difference is later versus sooner."

A vote for Morgan Griffith is a vote for more abortion.  I would personally rather have a Rick Boucher in office whom I can count on as being my enemy than a wishy-washy weasel like Morgan Griffith who will say he is my friend but stab me in the back.

McCain Debates Bush on Abortion in 2000

John McCain supports abortion and abortion funding.

On April 14, 2007 in Des Moines, Iowa, McCain publicly stated he
wanted to change the GOP platform regardig abortion.

And if a baby is conceived in a way McCain doesn't like, he
supports abortions to let women destroy its pre-born life.

McCain regularly votes to fund pro-abortion groups with your
tax  dollars.

These groups include the so-called Planned Parenthood, which
advocates for and provides abortions to women of all ages.

So please don't be fooled.

Call the MCCain campaign before it is too late. Tell John McCain to
knock it off and defend unborn babies no matter the
circumstances of their conception.  Call his close advisor,
Del. Chris Saxman and tell him to renounce his support and funding
of pro-abortion groups.

Call 540-886-8284.  That's 540-886-8284.

Watch the videos below.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=4824779&page=1

http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=4823197 

Reigning in the Power of the Federal Judiciary

Judges in the Federal Judiciary consistently decide cases over which they have absolutely no constitutional jurisdiction. Roe v. Wade is probably one of the best examples.

Ron Paul, candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, has written, "If the federal courts refuse to abide by the Constitution, the Congress should employ this constitutional remedy. By a simple majority, Congress could strip the federal courts of jurisdiction over abortion, thereby overturning the obviously unconstitutional Roe. At that point, the issue would revert to the states, where it constitutionally belongs, since no appeal to federal courts on the matter could be heard." (The Revolution A Manifesto).

Such legislation won't be forthcoming anytime soon. The great majority of our Senators and Congressmen are "sea anemones of virtue who can hardly wobble an antennae in the waters of negativity."

The Future

"The image of the future of this country is in the books, in the great prophecies of the twentieth century, that did not come from our pseudo-Christian leaders but came from the pen of Orwell and Huxley, and came from the filmic talent of Ridley Scott in "Bladerunner," that is the future. It is the totalitarian future, it is a future that works, it is a future that is efficient, it is a future in finally which our welfare, health and education problems will be solved, not by persuasion but by that gentle tyranny that is provided today to the one-child policy in China which Planned Parenthood supports, in which women are forced to abort the unwanted, the unwanted children which they themselves wish to bear. That is the future.

The future, the future of this country, is a geneticists, is a geneticists plaything, and is a nightmare to those who have any conception however vague or remote, however vague and distant, of ideas which once rang in our republic, of freedom, and dignity, and equal rights before the law; due process, and representation before the court system." -Frank Schaeffer, 1992

On Liberty

Americans for the most part LOVE the current system. So long as they have access to easy credit, keep the credit card payments up to date, abort their children, keep the bribes (taxes) to the US Treasury paid up, keep fuel in their fancy cars, and stay off the radar screen of the US Attorney's Office, absolutely NOTHING is going to change.

And why should there be any change? Our social engineering program "works" because it is tied to the free market and gives the illusion of prosperity.

Change won't happen until the whole house of cards comes crashing down. So I say let it come crashing down.

I don't want to save or reform the current system. It needs to be trashed thoroughly.

The final nail in the coffin of the US Constitution was hammered in with the defeat of the South in 1865. I don't think that the American people could live under such a system of freedom as the US Constitution affords them. It requires too much responsibility and character to maintain those freedoms.