I've been reading the latest on Climategate.
The much vaunted "peer-review" process has problems. As Dr. Tim Ball has rightly observed, the climate scientists argued that they were checking each others work. However "peer-review" just gave the climate scientists control over the process. The process made certain that no dissent was allowed and that a uniform politically correct message was churned out every day.
Websites that are on the cutting edge of exposing the climate fraud are Climate Depot and read the alleged CRU e-mails
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment